Minutes

For the Planning Committee Meeting

-
Tom Davies Square
Present (Mayor and Councillors)
  • Councillor McCausland,
  • Councillor Kirwan,
  • Councillor Lapierre,
  • Councillor Leduc,
  • and Councillor Landry-Altmann
City Officials
  • Kris Longston, Director of Planning Services,
  • Alex Singbush, Manager of Development Approvals,
  • Robert Webb, Supervisor of Development Engineering,
  • Glen Ferguson, Senior Planner,
  • Joe Rocca, Traffic and Asset Management Supervisor,
  • Keith Forrester, Manager of Real Estate,
  • Brigitte Sobush, Manager of Clerk's Services/Deputy City Clerk,
  • Christine Hodgins, Legislative Compliance Coordinator,
  • Franca Bortolussi, Administrative Assistant to the City Solicitor and Clerk,
  • Lisa Locken, Clerk's Services Assistant,
  • Vickie Hartley, Clerk's Services Assistant,
  • and Michel Lalonde, Clerk's Services Assistant

Councillor Kirwan, In the Chair


1.

The meeting commenced at 1:01 p.m.

2.

A roll call was conducted prior to the commencement of moving into closed session.

3.

  • The following resolution was presented:

    PL2021-115
    Moved ByCouncillor Leduc
    Seconded ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury moves to Closed Session to deal with two (2) Proposed or Pending
    Acquisition or Disposition of Land Matters regarding Meehan Avenue, Capreol and White Street, Val Caron in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001, s.239(2)(c).

    CARRIED

    At 1:03 p.m., the Planning Committee moved into Closed Session.


4.
  

At 1:26 p.m., the Planning Committee recessed.

5.

At 1:37 p.m., the Planning Committee commenced the Open Session.

6.

A roll call was conducted.

8.

The Planning Committee was adjourned and the Public Hearing was opened to deal with the application:

Dave Dorland, D.S. Dorland Ltd., agent for the applicants and Louise Buckingham and Ray Goulet, the applicants were present. 

Glen Ferguson, Senior Planner outlined the report.

The Planning Department responded to questions from the Committee members. 

The agent provided comments and responded to questions from the Committee members.

The Planning Department responded to questions from the applicants.

The applicant provided comments to the Committee members.

The Chair asked whether there was anyone else who wished to speak in favour or against this application and hearing none:

The Public Hearing concerning this matter was closed and the Planning Committee resumed in order to discuss and vote on the application.

  • Rules of Procedure

    With the concurrence of the Committee, the reading of the resolution was waived.

    The following resolution was presented:

    PL2021-116
    Moved ByCouncillor Lapierre
    Seconded ByCouncillor Leduc

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Ray Goulet & Louise Buckingham to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification on the subject lands from “R2-3”, Low Density Residential Two to “R2-3(S)”, Low Density Residential Two Special on those lands described as PIN 02128-0242, Parcel 5412 SES, Lot 133, Plan M-100, Lot 6, Concession 4, Township of McKim, as outlined in the report entitled “476 Montague Avenue, Sudbury”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    1. That prior to the enactment of an amending zoning by-law:

       

      1. The owners shall apply for all required building permits to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official;
      2. The owners shall apply for and receive final approval for a driveway entrance permit to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services;
      3. The owners shall apply for and receive final approval for an encroachment agreement permitting the existing porch to project into the Nadia Street right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services;
      4. That the owner submit a landscaping and parking layout plan depicting all landscaped open space, parking areas, parking spaces, parking aisles and landscaped areas associated with parking areas to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services prior to the passing of an amending zoning by-law; and,
      5. The owner shall have installed a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces on the lands in a location providing convenient access to main entrances or well-used areas on the lands to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.

         

    2. That the amending zoning by-law include the following site-specific provisions:

       

      1. That two apartment residential dwelling units on the ground floor and shared housing on the second-storey having a maximum of six guestrooms all within the existing residential building be the only permitted uses on the lands;
      2. That a minimum of four parking spaces be provided within the rear yard and a portion of the corner side yard and oriented toward the laneway with each parking space having a width of not less than 2.5 metres and a length of not less than 5.5 metres;
      3. That the encroaching covered porch that projects into the Nadia Street right-of-way be permitted to maintain a 0 metre corner side yard setback and that appropriate verbiage be included clarifying that the structure is permitted to encroach into the Nadia Street right-of-way; and,
      4. That any necessary further site-specific relief identified in the required landscaping and parking layout plan related to minimum landscaped open space requirements, sight triangles, parking and parking-related landscaping provisions of the City’s Zoning By-law be provided for accordingly.

         

    3. That conditional approval shall lapse on August 17, 2023 unless Condition #1 above has been met or an extension has been granted by Council.

    Rules of Procedure 

    A Recorded Vote was held:

    YEAS: (5)Councillor McCausland, Councillor Kirwan, Councillor Lapierre, Councillor Leduc, and Councillor Landry-Altmann
    CARRIED (5 to 0)

    As no public comment, written or oral, was received, there was no effect on the Planning Committee's decision.


Councillor McCausland, as Chair of the Closed Session, reported that the Committee met in Closed Session to deal with two (2) Proposed or Pending Acquisition or Disposition of Land Matters regarding Meehan Avenue, Capreol and White Street, Val Caron in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001, s.239(2)(c).

  • The following resolution was presented:

    PL2021-117
    Moved ByCouncillor Lapierre
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury authorize a lease agreement with Letterkenny/Get’Er Done
    Productions/New Metric Media, for space located within the Capreol Arena, at 20 Meehan Avenue, Capreol, being ice pad #1, and all the rooms and areas surrounding ice pad #1, for a three year term, with an option to renew for an additional three year term;

    AND THAT a by-law be presented authorizing the execution of the lease agreement.

  • Rules of procedure

    Councillor Lapierre presented the following amendment.

    Amendment:
    PL2021-117-A1
    Moved ByCouncillor Lapierre
    Seconded ByCouncillor Kirwan

    That the resolution be amended to include the following paragraph at the end:

    “AND THAT the leasing of the property is conditional upon the licensees rezoning of the property to permit the proposed exclusive use for film production activities.”

    CARRIED
  • The following is the resolution as amended:

    PL2021-117
    Moved ByCouncillor Lapierre
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    As amended:

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury authorize a lease agreement with Letterkenny/Get’Er Done
    Productions/New Metric Media, for space located within the Capreol Arena, at 20 Meehan Avenue,
    Capreol, being ice pad #1, and all the rooms and areas surrounding ice pad #1, for a three year
    term, with an option to renew for an additional three year term;

    AND THAT the leasing of the property is conditional upon the licensees rezoning of the property to permit the proposed exclusive use for film production activities;

    AND THAT a by-law be presented authorizing the execution of the lease agreement.

    Rules of Procedure

    A Recorded Vote was held:

    YEAS: (5)Councillor McCausland, Councillor Kirwan, Councillor Lapierre, Councillor Leduc, and Councillor Landry-Altmann
    CARRIED (5 to 0)
  • PL2021-118
    Moved ByCouncillor Lapierre
    Seconded ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury authorize the sale of vacant land west of White Street, Val Caron, in the Valley East Industrial Park, legally described as part of PIN 73501-1892(LT), part of Part 1 on Plan 53R-4285, Township of Blezard, City of Greater Sudbury;

    AND THAT a by-law be presented authorizing the sale and the execution of the documents required to complete the real estate transaction;

    AND THAT the net proceeds of the sale be credited to the Industrial Park Reserve Fund.

    CARRIED

10.

The following resolution was presented:

  • PL2021-119
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves Consent Agenda items 10.1.1 to 10.1.9.

    CARRIED

    The following are the Consent Agenda items:


10.1

  • PL2021-120
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for a plan of subdivision on those lands described as Part of PIN 73478-0607, Parcel 2877, Parts 1 & 2, 53R-18053, Lot 4, Concession 5, Township of Broder, File 780-6/12002, as outlined in the report entitled “Billiard’s Green Subdivision, Sudbury”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021 as follows:

    1. In Conditions #2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28 by replacing ‘Municipality’ or ‘City of Greater Sudbury’ with ‘City’.

    2. In Conditions #9 and 32, by replacing ‘Director of Planning’ with ‘Director of Planning Services’.

    3. By deleting Condition #10 and replacing it with the following:

    “10.That this draft approval shall lapse on November 7, 2024.”

    4. In Condition #12, by adding the following:

    •To the end of the last sentence: “, and the Nickel District Conservation Authority.”

    •New last sentence: “A soils caution agreement, if required, shall be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and the City Solicitor. The geotechnical engineer will be required to address On-site and Excess Soil Management in accordance with O. Reg. 406/19.”

    5. In Condition #14, by adding the following:

    •To the end of the first sentence: “, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and the Nickel District Conservation Authority.”; and

    •New last sentence: “A lot grading agreement, if required, shall be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and the City Solicitor.”

    6. By deleting Condition #16 and replacing it with the following:

    “#16. The owner shall provide to the City, as part of the submission of servicing plans a Sediment and Erosion Control Plan detailing the location and types of sediment and erosion control measures to be implemented during the construction of each phase of the project. Said plan shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and the Nickel District Conservation Authority. The siltation control shall remain in place until all disturbed areas have been stabilized. All sediment and erosion control measures shall be inspected daily to ensure that they are functioning properly and are maintained and/or updated as required. If the sediment and erosion control measures are not functioning properly, no further work shall occur until the sediment and/or erosion problem is addressed.”

    7. By deleting Condition #24, 25 and 31 in their entirety and adding new Condition #34:

    “34. A stormwater management report and associated plans must be submitted by the Owner’s Consulting Engineer for approval by the City and the Nickel District Conservation Authority. The report must address the following requirements:

    a) The underground storm sewer system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or convey the minor storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 2-year design storm. Any resulting post development runoff in excess of the 2-year design storm must be conveyed through overland flow system within the City’s right-of-way.

    b) There is a wetland on the subject parcel. The flood retention capacity of the lost wetland must be identified, and it must be demonstrated that the flood retention capacity of the lost wetland has been accommodated.

    c) “Enhanced” level must be used for the design of stormwater quality controls as defined by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks.

    d) The drainage catchment boundary including external tributary catchments and their respective area must be clearly indicated with any stormwater management plan.

    e) The final grading of the lands shall be such that the surface water originating on or tributary to the said lands, including roof water from buildings and surface water from paved areas, will be discharged in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure.

    f) Minor storm drainage from the plan of subdivision shall not be drained overland onto adjacent properties.

    g) Existing drainage patterns on adjacent properties shall not be altered unless explicit permission is granted.

    h) The owner is required to provide a cash contribution in lieu of onsite stormwater quantity controls and for stormwater improvements within the watershed as outlined in the Algonquin Road Watershed Stormwater Management Study.

    The owner shall be responsible for the design and construction of any required stormwater management works, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure as part of the servicing plans for the subdivision and the owner shall dedicate the lands for stormwater management works as a condition of this development.”

    8. In Conditions #26 and 27 by replacing ‘developer’, or ‘developer/owner’ with ‘owner’.

    9. In Condition #33, by replacing ‘General Manager of Growth and Development and ‘General Manager of Infrastructure Services with ‘General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure’.

    10. By adding new condition #35:

    “35.Draft approval does not guarantee completion of stormwater improvements within the watershed as outlined in the Algonquin Road Watershed Stormwater Management Study. Prior to the signing of the final plan, the Director of Planning Services is to be advised by the General Manager of Infrastructure Services, that sufficient off-site stormwater quantity control(s) exist to service any resulting post development runoff in excess of the 2-year design storm, under the regulatory storm scenario. The regulatory storm is the greater of the 100-year or Timmins storm.”

    11. By adding new Condition #36:

    “36. That the owner obtain approval from the Nickel District Conservation Authority for the placement of fill, the alteration of existing grades or any construction activity at this location under the Authority’s Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 156/06) prior to undertaking the proposed works. Following the completion of these works, the Owner shall agree to engage a qualified professional to certify in writing that the works were constructed in accordance with the plans, reports and specifications as approved by the Nickel District Conservation Authority and the City. The owner shall agree to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and measures contained within the plans and reports approved by the Nickel District Conservation Authority and the City.”

    12. By adding new Condition #37:

    “37. That in accordance with Section 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, a notice of agreement shall be registered on title to ensure that persons who first purchase the subdivided land after registration of the plan of subdivision are informed, at the time the land is transferred, of all development charges related to development.”

    By adding the following note to the conditions of draft approval:

    “1. Please be advised that the Nickel District Conservation Authority regulates the hazards associated with natural features and uses the attached mapping as a tool to identify those hazards for the public. Although the Nickel District Conservation Authority makes every effort to ensure accurate mapping, regulated natural hazards may exist on-site that have not yet been identified. Should a regulated natural hazard be discovered as the site is developed, the applicant must halt works immediately and contact Conservation Sudbury directly at 705.674.5249. Regulated natural hazards include floodplains, watercourses, shorelines, wetlands, valley slopes.’”

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-121
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for a plan of subdivision on those lands described as PIN 73504-2823, Parcel 22436 'A' SES, Lot 6, Concession 2, Township of Hanmer, File 780-7/08001, as outlined in the report entitled “Jeanne D’Arc-Dugas Street Subdivision, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021 as follows:

    1.In Conditions #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 28 by replacing ‘Municipality’ or ‘City of Greater Sudbury’ with ‘City’.

    2.In Condition #10, by replacing ‘Director of Planning’ with ‘Director of Planning Services’.

    3.In Condition #10, by replacing ‘General Manager of Public Works’ with ‘General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure.

    4.By deleting Condition #11 and replacing it with the following:

    “11.That this draft approval shall lapse on June 23, 2024.”

    5.In Condition #17:

    By deleting the following: “The stormwater management plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Nickel District Conservation Authority.”

    By adding the following: “The geotechnical engineer will be required to address On-site and Excess Soil Management in accordance with O. Reg. 406/19.”

    6.In Condition #18, by adding the following:
    “A lot grading agreement, if required, shall be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and the City Solicitor.”

    7.In Conditions #18, 28 and 33 by replacing ‘owner/applicant ‘with ‘owner’.

    8.In Condition #24, by deleting reference to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

    9.By adding new Condition #35:

    “35. That the applicant/owner prepare a flood analysis of the realigned watercourse to the satisfaction of the Nickel District Conservation Authority. The analysis must demonstrate that the regional flood, being the Timmins Storm, is contained within the banks of the realigned watercourse. If the proposed realigned watercourse is to be enclosed as part of the final build out, the applicant/owner must demonstrate that the enclosure of the watercourse is sized properly so that the regional flood can flow unimpeded, and without affecting the floodplain up- or downstream.

    10.By adding new Condition #36:

    “36.That the applicant/owner must demonstrate that there is no floodplain within the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Nickel District Conservation Authority. Please contact Nickel District Conservation Authority directly to discuss how this can be accomplished.”

    11. By adding the following note to the conditions of draft approval:

    “1. Please be advised that the Nickel District Conservation Authority regulates the hazards associated with natural features and uses the attached mapping as a tool to identify those hazards for the public. Although the Nickel District Conservation Authority makes every effort to ensure accurate mapping, regulated natural hazards may exist on-site that have not yet been identified. Should a regulated natural hazard be discovered as the site is developed, the applicant must halt works immediately and contact Conservation Sudbury directly at 705.674.5249. Regulated natural hazards include floodplains, watercourses, shorelines, wetlands, valley slopes.”

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-122
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by 1257620 Ontario Limited to extend the conditional approval of rezoning application File # 751-8/06-1 on lands described as Parcel 22159 SWS, Lot 7 Concession 6, Waters Township, for a period of two (2) years to June 28, 2023, as outlined in the report entitled “Sixth Avenue, Lively”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021, and be amended as follows:

    1. Deleting Condition a) (ii) and replacing it with the following:

    (ii) The applicant provide the Development Services Section with a registered survey plan of the lands to

    be rezoned to R1-5 Special and R3 Special, and which demonstrates that no development is proposed

    within theextent of the regulatory flood elevation to the satisfaction of Conservation Sudbury.

    1. That in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is required to be provided for changes to the amending zoning by-law as provided for in this resolution.

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-123
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for a plan of subdivision on those lands described as PIN 73347-0708, Parts 1 & 2, 53R-17360, Lot 7, Concession 2, Township of Rayside, File 780-5/11005, as outlined in the report entitled “Koskiniemi Subdivision, Azilda”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021, as follows:

    1. In Conditions #2, 3, and 5 by replacing ‘Municipality’ or ‘City of Greater Sudbury’ with ‘City’.

    2. In Conditions #7 and 21, by replacing ‘Director of Planning’ or ‘Director of Planning Services of the City of Greater Sudbury’ with ‘Director of Planning Services’.

    3. By deleting Condition #8 and replacing it with the following:

    “8. That this draft approval shall lapse on May 31, 2024.”

    4. By adding the following to the end of Condition #10:

    “A soils caution agreement, if required, shall be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and City Solicitor.”


    5. By replacing Condition #11 with the following:

    “11. Montee Principale shall be constructed to an urban standard from St. Agnes to the
    north limit of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the General Manger of Growth and Infrastructure."

    6. In Conditions #12, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26 and 28 by replacing owner/applicant with ‘owner’.

    7. By replacing Condition #13 with the following:

    “13. A stormwater management report and associated plans must be submitted by the Owner’s Consulting Engineer for approval by the City and the Nickel District Conservation Authority.

    The report must address the following requirements:

      • The underground storm sewer system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or convey the minor storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 2 year design storm. The permissible minor storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing pre-development site runoff resulting from a 2 year design storm. Any resulting post development runoff in excess of this permissible discharge rate must be controlled and detained within the plan of subdivision;

      • The overland flow system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or convey the major storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 100 year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever is greater, without causing damage to proposed and adjacent public and private properties. The permissible major storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing pre-development runoff resulting from a 100 year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever is greater;

      • “Enhanced” level must be used for the design of stormwater quality controls as defined by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks;

      • Stormwater management must follow the recommendations of the Whitewater Lake Subwatershed Study;

      • The drainage catchment boundary including external tributary catchments and their respective area must be clearly indicated with any stormwater management plan;

      • The final grading of the lands shall be such that the surface water originating on or tributary to the said lands, including roof water from buildings and surface water from paved areas, will be discharged in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure;

      • Minor storm drainage from the plan of subdivision shall not be drained overland onto adjacent properties; and,

      • Existing drainage patterns on adjacent properties shall not be altered unless explicit permission is granted.

    The owner shall be responsible for the design and construction of any required stormwater management subdivision and the owner shall dedicate the lands for stormwater management works as a condition of this development.”


    8. By replacing Condition #22 with the following:

    “22.That the owner construct the sidewalk on the west side of Montee Principale along the frontage of the subject lands from Lot 1 to Lot 25.

    9. By deleting Condition #28 and replacing it with the following:

    “28. The owners/applicants shall, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services, demonstrate that all requirements set out by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks under the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied prior to the signing of the final plan and prior to any site alteration or development taking place on the subject lands.”

    10. By adding the following note to the conditions of draft approval:

    “1. Please be advised that the Nickel District Conservation Authority regulates the hazards associated with natural features and uses the attached mapping as a tool to identify those hazards for the public. Although the Nickel District Conservation Authority makes every effort to ensure accurate mapping, regulated natural hazards may exist on-site that have not yet been identified. Should a regulated natural hazard be discovered as the site is developed, the applicant must halt works immediately and contact Conservation Sudbury directly at 705.674.5249. Regulated natural hazards include floodplains, watercourses, shorelines, wetlands, valley slopes.”

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-124
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Tamara Butera to extend the approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File # 751-6/18-7, on those lands described as Part of PIN 73596-0678, Part of Lot 75, Plan M-264, Lot 7, Concession 1, Township of McKim, for a period of one year until August 11, 2022, as outlined in the report entitled “1306 Nesbitt Drive, Sudbury” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021.

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-125
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves designating Lot 57, 58 & 59, Plan M-439 as being deemed not to be part of a registered plan for the purposes of Section 50(3) of the Planning Act, as outlined in the report entitled “0 & 1020 Elisabella Street, Sudbury”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021; and,

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to prepare a by-law to enact deeming Lot 57, 58 & 59, Plan M-439 not to be part of a plan of subdivision for the purposes of Subsection 50(3) of the Planning Act.

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-126
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury direct the City’s Designated Municipal Officer to indicate a position of concurrence to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada with respect to the proposed radio-communication and broadcasting antenna system that is to be located on those lands known and described as PIN 73475-0205, Parcel 46039, Part 1, Plan 53R-9523, Lot 6, Concession 6, Township of Broder, as outlined in the report entitled “339 Harrison Drive, Sudbury – Antenna System”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    1. That the proponent submit a lot grading and drainage plan for the area in and around the proposed antenna system to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services; and,

    2. That the Designated Municipal Officer inform Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada in writing once Condition #1 above has been satisfied.
    CARRIED
  • PL2021-127
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury close by by-law and declares surplus to the City’s needs, part of unopened South Bay Road, Sudbury, legally described as part of PIN 73592-0348 (LT), South Bay Road, Plan M-423, part of Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of McKim;

    AND THAT the land be offered for sale to the abutting property owner to the south, pursuant to the procedures governing the sale of limited marketability surplus land in accordance with Property By-law 2008-174, as outlined in the report entitled “Part of Unopened South Bay Road, Sudbury – Road Closure and Declaration of Surplus Land”, from the General Manager of Corporate Services, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021.

    CARRIED
  • PL2021-128
    Moved ByCouncillor Landry-Altmann
    Seconded ByCouncillor McCausland

    THAT the City of Greater Sudbury declares surplus to the City's needs vacant land south west of Armstrong Road, Coniston, legally described as PIN 73560-1141(LT), part of Lot 7, Concession 3, Township of Neelon;

    AND THAT the vacant land be offered for sale to the abutting owners pursuant to the procedures governing the sale of limited marketability surplus land in accordance with Property By-law 2008-174, as outlined in the report entitled "Vacant Land South West of Armstrong Road, Coniston - Declaration of Surplus Land", from the General Manager of Corporate Services, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on August 16, 2021.

    CARRIED

11.

No Motions were presented.

13.

No Addendum was presented.

14.

No Petitions were submitted.

15.

No Questions were asked.

16.

Councillor Kirwan moved to adjourn the meeting. Time: 3:01 p.m.

CARRIED

No Item Selected