Resolution regarding Draft Plan of Subdivision Amendment:
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for the draft plan of subdivision on lands described as Part of PINs 73348-0734 & 73348-0005, Parts 1, 2 & 3, Plan 53R-20417 in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, City of Greater Sudbury, File 780-5/12005, as outlined in the report entitled “Errington Avenue, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, as follows:
A. That Condition #1 be deleted and replaced with the following:
“1. That this draft approval applies to the draft plan of subdivision of Part of PINs 73348-0005, 73348-0432 & 73348-0579 in Lots 2 & 3, Concession 2, Township of Balfour as shown on a plan of subdivision prepared by Terry Del Bosco, O.L.S., and dated November 28, 2012, as amended by a plan prepared by Terry Del Bosco, O.L.S., and dated July 6, 2022.”
B. By deleting Condition #10 and replacing it with the following:
“10. That this draft approval shall lapse on December 12, 2025.”
C. By deleting Condition #12 and replacing it with the following:
“12. The owner shall be required to upgrade Errington Avenue from Street 'F' to Mainville Street, to an urban collector standard complete with a sidewalk along the west side. The owner shall contribute towards the improvement on a per lot basis, with the total amount paid prior to half of the subdivision (100 lots) being completed. The contribution per lot will be determined at the time of registration of each phase and it will be adjusted annually based on the CanaData Construction Cost Index.”
D. That Clauses b), c) and d) of Condition #14 be deleted;
E. That the following be added to Condition #15:
“The geotechnical engineer will be required to address On-site and Excess Soil Management in accordance with O. Reg. 406/19.”
F. That the following be added to Condition #17:
“The lot grading plan shall demonstrate that no fill has been added to the flood plain. A note to the lot grading plan must be added that lots containing flood plain cannot develop within the flood plain."
G. By changing “Union Gas” to “Enbridge” in Condition #22;
H. By deleting Condition #25 and replacing it with the following:
“25. A stormwater management report and associated plans must be submitted by the Owner’s Consulting Engineer for approval by the City. The report must address the following requirements:
• The underground storm sewer system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or convey the minor storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 2-year design storm. The permissible minor storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing pre-development site runoff resulting from a 2-year design storm. Any resulting post development runoff in excess of this permissible discharge rate must be controlled and detained within the plan of subdivision;
• The overland flow system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or convey the major storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 100-year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever is greater, without causing damage to proposed and adjacent public and private properties. The permissible major storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing pre-development runoff resulting from a 100-year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever is greater;
• “Enhanced” level must be used for the design of stormwater quality controls as defined by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks;
• Stormwater management must follow the recommendations of the Whitson River Subwatershed Study;
• The drainage catchment boundary including external tributary catchments and their respective area must be clearly indicated with any stormwater management plan;
• The final grading of the lands shall be such that the surface water originating on or tributary to the said lands, including roof water from buildings and surface water from paved areas, will be discharged in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure;
• Minor storm drainage from the plan of subdivision shall not be drained overland onto adjacent properties; and,
• Existing drainage patterns on adjacent properties shall not be altered unless explicit permission is granted.
The owner shall be responsible for the design and construction of any required stormwater management works to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure as part of the servicing plans for the subdivision and the owner shall dedicate the lands for stormwater management works as a condition of this development.”
I. By deleting Condition #26 and replacing it with the following:
“26. Proposed development adjacent to natural watercourses, and within 15 metres of the watercourse, must be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Conservation Sudbury. A Section 28 application to Conservation Sudbury may be required.”
J. By deleting Condition #27 and replacing it with the following:
“27. Development on Lots 22-36, adjacent to the realigned Whitson River - Tributary III, must be reviewed and approved by Conservation Sudbury. A Flood Plain Study will be required to the satisfaction of Conservation Sudbury in order to assess the impact of the realigned watercourse on the proposed lots, which may include adjusting the rear lot lines of Lots 22-36 to the satisfaction of Conservation Sudbury and the Director of Planning Services. Furthermore, the owner is required to design and construct a realigned channel to the satisfaction of Conservation Sudbury and the Director of Planning Services and in agreement with the findings of the Flood Plain Study.”
K. By deleting the reference to Block C in Condition #28;
L. By deleting Condition #29;
M. By deleting Condition #30;
N. By adding the following to Condition #31:
“31. Canada Post will provide mail delivery service to the townhouse portion (19 units) of the subdivision through centralized Community Mail-Boxes (CMBs). Given the number and the layout of the lots in the subdivision, 10 CMB(s) locations will be necessary as follows:
a. Side of Lot 27
b. Side of Lot 37
c. Side of Lot 53
d. Side of Lot 105
e. Side of Lot 186
f. Side of Lot 181
g. Side of Lot 65
h. Side of Lot 163
i. Side of Lot 128
j. Side of Lot 119
O. That the reference to Condition #29 be deleted in Condition #32;
P. That the lot references to Drain “A” and Drain “C” be deleted in Condition #35;
Q. By deleting Condition #36;
R. By deleting the reference to Street B in Condition #37;
S. By adding the following as new Condition #40:
“40. The owner must identify the limits of the wetlands on site through wetland mapping by a qualified professional (certified under the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System or otherwise approved by Conservation Sudbury). All development must be directed outside of the wetland. Any development within 30 metres of the wetland, including lot grading and work approved through the subdivision process, will require a direct application to Conservation Sudbury under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act and will be subject to Conservation Sudbury’s Wetland Guidelines and will need to demonstrate that development does not interfere with the hydrology of the wetland.”
T. By adding the following as new Condition #41:
“41. The erosion hazard associated with watercourses that are not designated as municipal drains must be determined using the scientific principles and methods prescribed in the Technical Guide to River and Stream Systems: Erosion Hazard Limit (MNR, 2002). The hazard limit must be shown on the plans. A direct application to Conservation Sudbury under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act is required for any development proposed within 15 metres of the erosion hazard.”
Rules of Procedure
A Roll Call Vote was held: