THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to re-draft and amend the conditions of draft approval for a plan of subdivision on those lands described as PIN 73597-0740,
Part of Part 3, Plan 53R-5831, Part of Parts 1 to 3, Plan 53R-13212 and Part of Parts 1 & 3, Plan
53R-15146, Part of Lot 8, Concession 1, Township of McKim, File # 780-6/89019W, as outlined in
the report entitled “Moonglo West Subdivision”, from the General Manager of Growth and
Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee on December 13, 2021, as follows:
1.By adding the following at the end of Condition #1:
“, and as further amended and as depicted on a draft plan prepared by Tulloch Engineering and
R.V. Anderson Associates Limited and signed by Terry Del Bosco, O.L.S. and dated March 12,
2021.”;
2.By deleting the first sentence in Condition #27 and replacing it with the following:
“That the owner shall to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure and
the Nickel District Conservation Authority provide a soils report prepared by a geotechnical engineer
licensed in the Province of Ontario.”;
3.By deleting Condition #28 and replacing it with the following:
“28.That a stormwater management report and associated plans must be submitted by the Owner’s
Consulting Engineer for approval by the City and the Nickel District Conservation Authority. The
report must address the following requirements:
a)The underground storm sewer system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to
accommodate and/or convey the minor storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the
subject site and any external tributary areas using the City’s 5-year design storm. The permissible
minor storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing predevelopment
site runoff resulting from a 5-year design storm. Any resulting post development runoff in excess of this permissible discharge rate must be controlled and detained within the plan of
subdivision;
b)The overland flow system within the plan of subdivision must be designed to accommodate and/or
convey the major storm flow, that is, the rainfall runoff resulting from the subject site and any
external tributary areas using the City’s 100-year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever
is greater, without causing damage to proposed and adjacent public and private properties. The
permissible major storm discharge from the subject development must be limited to the existing predevelopment runoff resulting from a 100-year design storm or Regional storm event, whichever is
greater;
c)“Enhanced” level must be used for the design of stormwater quality controls as defined by the
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks;
d)Stormwater management must follow the recommendations of the Junction Creek Sub-watershed
Study;
e)The drainage catchment boundary including external tributary catchments and their respective
area must be clearly indicated with any stormwater management plan;
f)The final grading of the lands shall be such that the surface water originating on or tributary to the
said lands, including roof water from buildings and surface water from paved areas, will be
discharged in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure;
g)Minor storm drainage from the plan of subdivision shall not be drained overland onto adjacent
properties;
h)Existing drainage patterns on adjacent properties shall not be altered unless explicit permission is
granted; and
i)The owner shall be responsible for the design and construction of any required stormwater
management works to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure as part
of the servicing plans for the subdivision and the owner shall dedicate the lands for stormwater
management works as a condition of this development.”;
4.By deleting Condition #38 and replacing it with the following:
“38.That prior to any vegetation removal or other site alteration on the subject lands, the owner shall
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services that all requirements set out by
the Province under the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied.”;
5.By deleting Condition #46 and replacing it with the following:
“46. That the owner shall provide to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and
Infrastructure and the Nickel District Conservation Authority a detailed lot grading and drainage plan
prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by a professional civil engineer with a valid Certificate of
Authorization from the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario for the proposed lots as
part of the submission of servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses,
retaining walls, side yards, swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on
boundary properties to mesh the lot grading of the new site to existing properties. A lot grading
agreement shall be registered on title, if required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning
Services and City Solicitor. The owner/applicant shall be responsible for the legal costs of preparing
and registering the associated lot grading agreement.
The lot grading and drainage plan must address the following requirements:
a)Development as defined by the Conservation Authorities Act shall not be permitted within the
floodplain without the following items to the satisfaction of Conservation Sudbury:
i)Justification for the development;
ii)Demonstration that development will not impact flooding; and
iii)Demonstration that proposed fill has a compensatory cut that is hydrologically connected to the
floodplain and at equal elevations.
b)Lots 130 to 144 inclusive, and Block 158 must meet floodproofing criteria of Conservation
Sudbury. Fill must be placed to at least the regulatory flood elevation. The lowest opening (ie.
window, door, vent, etc.) into the building must be at least 0.30 metres above the regulatory flood
elevation. These requirements must be clearly indicated on the lot-grading as built surveys and
circulated to Conservation Sudbury for approval.”;
6.By deleting Condition #48 and replacing it with the following:
“48.That the owner shall provide to the City, as part of the submission of servicing plans a Sediment
and Erosion Control Plan detailing the location and types of sediment and erosion control measures
to be implemented during the construction of each phase of the project. Said plan shall be to the
satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and Development and the Nickel District
Conservation Authority. The siltation control shall remain in place until all disturbed areas have
been stabilized. All sediment and erosion control measures shall be inspected daily to ensure that
they are functioning properly and are maintained and/or updated as required. If the sediment and
erosion control measures are not functioning properly, no further work shall occur until the sediment
and/or erosion problem is addressed.”; and
7.By adding a new Condition #52 as follows:
“52.That Block 186 on the draft plan is to be utilized as a footpath and developed as per GSSD
570.010 with fencing at the property lines that border Lots #129, #130, and #190, and the existing
lot on Nova Drive. This footpath will connect to the sidewalk network at Street ‘B’ utilizing a sidewalk
along the eastern cul-de-sac of Street ‘K.’”
Recess
At 2:39 p.m. the Committee recessed.
Reconvene
At 2:45 p.m. the Committee reconvened